“Grenser i det grenselause” på BORA

Masteravhandlinga i historie eg har streva med dei siste åra er no tilgjengeleg på BORA, Bergen Open Research Archive:

Grenser i det grenselause – Opprettinga av Transjordan sine ørkengrenser (pdf)

Avhandlinga fokuserar for det meste på grensene som vart etablert mellom eit nyoppretta emiratet Transjordan og det raskt ekspanderande Nejd under Ibn Saud, grunnleggaren av Saudi-Arabia. Perioden eg har tatt føre meg er i hovudsak 1921-1925 der hovudtrekka til grensene kjem i stand. Strida om grensene står i byrjinga mellom Transjordan og Nejd i Wadi Sirhan, ei handelsrute mellom Syria og Arabia, mellom Transjordan og Hijaz i Akaba-området, og mellom Hijaz og Nejd. I tillegg har eg ei raskare oppsummering fram til 1965 då problema 1925-grensene hadde ført med seg får ei løysing. Grenseavtalen av 1965 vart av Richard Schofield, ein historisk geograf, kalla “the most imaginative territorial settlement yet concluded within the Arabian peninsula/Gulf region.” Denne prosessen tok derimot over 40 år og er ein av dei meir ukjende/gløymde grensekonfliktene i Midtausten.

Formingsåra 1921-1925 tar føre seg eit slags samspel mellom Transjordan (kong Abdullah), Nejd (sultan Ibn Saud og wahhabirørsla), Hijaz (kong/sharif Hussein og kong Ali) og til slutt Storbritannia og dei forskjellige britiske departementa (WO, FO, IO og CO).

————–

My Master thesis on the establishment of borders between Transjordan and the future Saudi Arabia is now available online. Just press the pdf link above. The thesis is written in Norwegian, but if you are interested there is a short (and very hastily written) summary in English inside. Most of the quotes are in English also.

Lieberman heng opp bilete av Hitler og stormufti al-Husseini på israelske ambassadar

Etter ein ide av Israel sin høgre-ekstreme utanriksminister, Avigdor Lieberman, skal no alle ambassadane til Israel henge opp eit kjend bilete frå 1941 av Hitler og stormuftien av Jerusalem, Hajj Amin al-Husseini. Dette skriv den britiske avisa The Independent. Grunnen til dette skal vere å minske kritikk om utviding av ulovlege israelske busettingar på Vestbreidda. Israelske diplomatar er derimot uroa for at bilete heller skal gjere vondt verre.

Ein israelsk diplomat har påpeika so har biletet ingenting med utvidinga av busettingane å gjere. Det verkar heller som Lieberman likar samanstille palestinarane med nazistane og dimed spele på Holocaust og heller vise til Hitler framfor å kome med saklege argument. At det er nettopp Lieberman som er mannen bak dette stuntet er ikkje spesielt overraskande med tanke på tidlegare utsegn der han støttar etnisk rensing og vil kaste ut alle israelske arabarar frå Israel. Om Lieberman vil tvinge fram møtet mellom Husseini og Hitler, kan ein svare med ein liknande og like relevant mynt og minne om møtet mellom SS og Haganah i 1937, då sjølvaste Adolf Eichmann (som vart dømt til døden og hengd i Israel i 1961) prøvde å få Hagana til å hjelpe til med deportering av jødar til Palestina. Kanskje ein kan henge opp eit bilete av det om det fins eit. Det må nesten nemnast at dei møtte ein Hagana-agent i Kairo, Feival Polkes, og berre la fram planane sine utan at det skjedde so særleg mykje meir.

Hajj Amin al-Husseini er ein ganske interessant historisk person som er verdt å lese meir om, spesielt  om det noko turbulente og ikkje alltid like vennlege forholdet mellom han og Abdullah I av Jordan.

Elles har israelske styresmakter fjerna ordet al-nakba, katastrofe, frå ein setning i skulebøkene til israelsk-arabiske born mellom åtte og ni år. Ordet er som kjend det arabarane brukar om krigen i 1948 og opprettinga av Israel. Setninga som vart endra er i følgje BBC slik:

“The Arabs call the war the Nakba – a war of catastrophe, loss and humiliation – and the Jews call it the Independence War.”

Grunnlaget for fjerninga av ordet, som har vore i bøkene sidan 2007, var i følgje israelske styresmakter det var ingen til at nokon stat skulle presentere grunnlegginga si som eit holocaust eller ein katastrofe. Hebraiske skulebøker skal i tillegg vere forskjellige frå dei arabiske og legg stor vekt på jødiske heroisme og dyssar ned historia om palestinske flyktningar.

“saving precious fragments from the ruin to which they are doomed”

According to a new UNESCO report American troops and contractors have caused “substantial damage to the archaeological site at Babylon in Iraq after the 2003 invasion”.

John Curtis, an archaeologist from the British Museum, stated that soldiers most likely broke loose pieces of stones from the ruins as souvenirs. This reminded me of Michael B. Oren’s description of American tourists in Egypt in the 1870s:

“About the only time, it seemed, that Americans dallied in the Middle East was to desecrate or pillage its monuments. On pyramids and tombs and obelisks, Americans left their mark in the form of brilliantly rendered Stars and Stripes and hieroglyphs hastily chiseled off. [...] And what they could not steal or vandalize, Americans were ravenous to buy. [...] The disrespect that Americans displayed for the classical past of the Middle East was only exceeded by their contempt for its contemporary society” (p. 230)

An illustration in his book Power, Faith and Fantasy – American in the Middle East 1776 to the Present shows American female tourists chipping souvenirs from a column in an ancient Egyptian temple, where they are “saving precious fragments from the ruin to which they are doomed”.

There is of course a big difference between soldiers in Iraq and the tourists mentioned, both in time and in reasons for being there. The damage in Babylon is also not caused by tourism, but by war and carelessness. In Babylon the Americans had an army base in 2003-2004 were (from BBC News):

“[...] troops and contractors dug long trenches through the ancient ruins, bulldozed hilltops and drove heavy vehicles over the fragile paving of pathways which were once held sacred.”

Dragon carvings on the famous Ishtar Gate have also been heavily damaged. It might be important to mention that parts of this gate is spread across museums all over the world and that the Americans are not the only ones taking bits and pieces back home from abroad. A reproduction of the gate serving as an entrance to an unfinished museum, built in Iraq during Saddam Hussein has also been damaged by the war.

Ishtar Gate (Flickr/CC/youngrobv (Rob & Ale)

Ishtar Gate reproduction, Berlin (Flickr/CC/youngrobv (Rob & Ale)

Ishtar Gate replica in Babylon 2004 (Wikipedia Commons)

Ishtar Gate replica in Babylon 2004 (Wikipedia Commons)

The US also stated that the damages and looting in Babylon when under their control would have been worse if they had not been there at all. A bit hard to believe when Donald Rumsfeld, Defense Secretary at the time, stated on the looting in Iraq after the invasion that “stuff happens” and that the looting was a “part of the price” for the liberation of Iraq. With such a mindset from the very top it is hard not to see “the disrespect that Americans displayed for the classical past”.

These damages are a violation of the the 1954 Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict and the notion of military necessity, but this convention is usually ignored during war and conflicts the world over. Some of the damages to Babylon can be seen here.

The UNESCO Report (pdf): FINAL REPORT on Damage Assessment in Babylon by International Coordination Committee for the Saveguarding of the Cultural Heritage of Iraq

An earlier report from December 2004: Report on Meeting at Babylon 11th – 13th December 2004 (includes a few maps of the area)

Conclusions from the latter:

  • About one dozen trenches, the largest 170m long, and about one dozen cuttings, have been made both into previously undisturbed archaeological deposits and into tips or mounds from earlier excavations. In these trenches were found pottery (including a complete vase), bones and fragments of brick with cuneiform inscriptions.
  • About 300,000 sq. metres of the site have been covered with gravel, sometimes compacted and chemically treated, to be used as a helipad and to create spaces for vehicle parks, accommodation, storage, etc. All the gravel has been brought in from elsewhere, and will in due course work its way into the archaeological deposits, irrevocably contaminating them.
  • Around the site are thousands of sandbags and HESCO barriers that were originally filled with earth scooped up from the Babylon archaeological site (the presence of sherds and bones in the bags is a testimony to the archaeological nature of the deposits used) and from 3rd November 2003 onwards filled with sand and earth brought in from outside Babylon, sometimes no doubt from archaeological sites, thus exacerbating the problem even further.
  • In many parts of the site are wheel marks deriving from the movement of heavy vehicles, and damage is also likely to have been caused by the extensive helicopter traffic at the site.
  • There is evidence of environmental pollution (fuel seepage) in the area of the Fuel Farm. This is likely to have a deleterious effect on the archaeological deposits beneath.
  • There is damage to 9 of the moulded brick figures of dragons in the Ishtar Gate, in one case serious damage to the body of the figure.
  • The brick pavement in the south part of the 6th century BC Processional Way has been broken by driving a heavy vehicle along it.
  • Parts of the roof of the (reconstructed) Ninmah Temple have collapsed.

Saudi Smooth Criminal Dance

Michael Jackson’s Smooth Criminal the Saudi way:

Publisert på:  on sundag, 5 juli, 2009 at 23:11 Kommenter innlegget
Tags: , , , ,